Select personalised ads. Apply market research to generate audience insights. Measure content performance. Develop and improve products. List of Partners vendors. International trade increases the number of goods that domestic consumers can choose from, decreases the cost of those goods through increased competition, and allows domestic industries to ship their products abroad.
While all of these effects seem beneficial, free trade isn't widely accepted as completely beneficial to all parties. In fact, President Trump's presidential campaign was highly critical of free trade agreements. This article will examine how some countries react to a variety of factors that attempt to influence trade. In simplest terms, a tariff is a tax. It adds to the cost borne by consumers of imported goods and is one of several trade policies that a country can enact.
Tariffs are paid to the customs authority of the country imposing the tariff. Tariffs on imports coming into the United States, for example, are collected by Customs and Border Protection, acting on behalf of the Commerce Department. It is important to recognize that the taxes owed on imports are paid by domestic consumers and not imposed directly on the foreign country's exports.
Often, goods from abroad are cheaper because they offer cheaper capital or labor costs; if those goods become more expensive, then consumers will choose the relatively costlier domestic product.
Overall, consumers tend to lose out with tariffs, where the taxes are collected domestically. Tariffs are often created to protect infant industries and developing economies but are also used by more advanced economies with developed industries. The levying of tariffs is often highly politicized. The possibility of increased competition from imported goods can threaten domestic industries. These domestic companies may fire workers or shift production abroad to cut costs, which means higher unemployment and a less happy electorate.
The unemployment argument often shifts to domestic industries complaining about cheap foreign labor, and how poor working conditions and lack of regulation allow foreign companies to produce goods more cheaply. In economics, however, countries will continue to produce goods until they no longer have a comparative advantage not to be confused with an absolute advantage.
A government may levy a tariff on products that it feels could endanger its population. For example, South Korea may place a tariff on imported beef from the United States if it thinks that the goods could be tainted with a disease. The use of tariffs to protect infant industries can be seen by the Import Substitution Industrialization ISI strategy employed by many developing nations.
The government of a developing economy will levy tariffs on imported goods in industries in which it wants to foster growth. This increases the prices of imported goods and creates a domestic market for domestically produced goods while protecting those industries from being forced out by more competitive pricing. It decreases unemployment and allows developing countries to shift from agricultural products to finished goods.
Criticisms of this sort of protectionist strategy revolve around the cost of subsidizing the development of infant industries. If an industry develops without competition, it could wind up producing lower quality goods, and the subsidies required to keep the state-backed industry afloat could sap economic growth.
Barriers are also employed by developed countries to protect certain industries that are deemed strategically important, such as those supporting national security. Defense industries are often viewed as vital to state interests, and often enjoy significant levels of protection. For example, while both Western Europe and the United States are industrialized, both are very protective of defense-oriented companies.
Countries may also set tariffs as a retaliation technique if they think that a trading partner has not played by the rules. For example, if France believes that the United States has allowed its wine producers to call its domestically produced sparkling wines "Champagne" a name specific to the Champagne region of France for too long, it may levy a tariff on imported meat from the United States.
In the agricultural sector, in fact, subsidies sometimes kick in automatically if prices of farm products fall below a certain level. For its part, the EU re-introduced export refunds for butter, cheese, and whole and skimmed-milk powder in January. A subsidy battle looms large. It seems that the practice of protectionism is shifting away from discrimination against foreign competitors by imposing tariffs towards actively providing preferential treatment to domestic companies via subsidies.
And in this case the logic of intra-industrial trade cannot be used as a counter argument, since subsidies place no limits on the domestic companies in their intra-industrial trade. As a consequence, there is even a sizeable lobby that actually favours measures in this gray area of protectionism. And the ones that have to foot the bill will be foreign suppliers that are perhaps more competitive as well as domestic consumers.
The fact that budget restrictions put certain limits on such a subsidy battle does nothing to reduce its contentiousness. For the more the spirit of free trade is violated, the sooner protectionist tendencies are likely to escalate. This results in a lower domestic price. Both tariffs and subsidies raise the price of foreign goods relative to domestic goods, which reduces imports. From an economic perspective, though, the costs to the economy of reducing its opportunities to trade almost always outweigh the benefits enjoyed by those who are protected.
Protectionism , from the Concise Encyclopedia of Economics. The fact that trade protection hurts the economy of the country that imposes it is one of the oldest but still most startling insights economics has to offer.
The idea dates back to the origin of economic science itself…. While virtually all economists think free trade is desirable, they differ on how best to make the transition from tariffs and quotas to free trade. The three basic approaches to trade reform are unilateral, multilateral, and bilateral….
Free Trade , from the Concise Encyclopedia of Economics. For more than two centuries, economists have steadfastly promoted free trade among nations as the best trade policy.
Despite this intellectual barrage, many practical men and women of affairs continue to view the case for free trade skeptically, as an abstract argument made by ivory-tower economists with, at most, one foot on terra firma. Free Trade vs. Protectionism , a LearnLiberty video. According to Don Boudreaux, free trade is nothing more than a system of trade that treats foreign goods and services no differently than domestic goods and services Protectionism, on the other hand, is a system of trade that discriminates against foreign goods and services in an attempt to favor domestic goods and services..
If economists are so convinced of the benefits of free trade, why are there so many arguments against it in the press? Many fallacies and myths have persisted for centuries, tracing back to an old idea called Mercantilism , which advocated promoting exports over imports a positive Trade Balance. Even though Adam Smith , founder of modern economics, turned mercantilism on its head in with the publication of The Wealth of Nations , the errors continue. Below are some light, humorous readings confronting just a few of the most common logical errors, emphasizing how to answer when you hear those mistakes being made.
Popular myth: Trade barriers are good for the economy. Economic reality: Trade barriers benefit some people—usually the producers of the protected good—but only at even greater expense of others—the consumers.
See this satire on lobbying:. Chapter 7 in Economic Sophisms , first published in France. You are on the right track. You reject abstract theories and have little regard for abundance and low prices. You concern yourselves mainly with the fate of the producer. You wish to free him from foreign competition, that is, to reserve the domestic market for domestic industry …. We are suffering from the ruinous competition of a foreign rival who apparently works under conditions so far superior to our own for the production of light that he is flooding the domestic market with it at an incredibly low price; for the moment he appears, our sales cease, all the consumers turn to him, and a branch of French industry whose ramifications are innumerable is all at once reduced to complete stagnation.
This rival, which is none other than the sun,…. Economic reality: Unilateral reduction of trade barriers is better than no reduction at all. Chapter 10 in Economic Sophisms , first published in France. There are many different ways of calculating whether a particular product is being dumped heavily or only lightly. The agreement narrows down the range of possible options. And the agreement also specifies how a fair comparison can be made between the export price and what would be a normal price.
Calculating the extent of dumping on a product is not enough. Anti-dumping measures can only be applied if the dumping is hurting the industry in the importing country. Therefore, a detailed investigation has to be conducted according to specified rules first. The investigation must evaluate all relevant economic factors that have a bearing on the state of the industry in question.
If the investigation shows dumping is taking place and domestic industry is being hurt, the exporting company can undertake to raise its price to an agreed level in order to avoid anti-dumping import duty. Detailed procedures are set out on how anti-dumping cases are to be initiated, how the investigations are to be conducted, and the conditions for ensuring that all interested parties are given an opportunity to present evidence.
Anti-dumping measures must expire five years after the date of imposition, unless an investigation shows that ending the measure would lead to injury.
Other conditions are also set. For example, the investigations also have to end if the volume of dumped imports is negligible i. The agreement says member countries must inform the Committee on Anti-Dumping Practices about all preliminary and final anti-dumping actions, promptly and in detail.
They must also report on all investigations twice a year. When differences arise, members are encouraged to consult each other. What is this agreement called? Agreement on the implementation of Article VI [i. This agreement does two things: it disciplines the use of subsidies, and it regulates the actions countries can take to counter the effects of subsidies. The agreement contains a definition of subsidy.
The disciplines set out in the agreement only apply to specific subsidies. They can be domestic or export subsidies.
0コメント